Are you confused about AI copyright? You aren’t alone!I am going break down what ai artists have to know in regards to the copyright …
source
Tags: aiai artai art controversyai art copyrightai art copyright infringementai art copyright lawai art copyright rulingai art no copyrightai copyrightai copyright issueai copyright lawai copyright lawsuitai copyright removerartificial intelligenceartificial intelligence newsartificial intelligence news 2023can you copyright ai artCopyrightExplainedis ai art copyrightedlatest news about robotics technologylatest robotslatest robots 2023lawmachine learningrobot newsrobotics newsrobotics news 2023robotics technologies llcrobotics technology
Thanks for watching!
What topics on AI would you like to see me cover next?
And if you have any thoughts on how to make my videos even better for you, please let me know, I'm all ears.
🙂
I think I may trust AI more to create that "arbitrary line" more than humans.
Ai is pure evil and should be illegal.
The current copyright system seems misguided and hinders progress. Claiming copyright on a prompt doesn't make sense, as the generated image always varies. Similarly, not granting copyright to AI-generated images because they aren't created by humans is as illogical as denying copyright to a photograph based on the fact that it's primarily captured by a camera. Using a prompt in AI is akin to adjusting focus or applying filters in a camera; both should be treated equally. Moreover, artistic styles serve as inspiration and should remain exempt from copyright claims. Lastly, AI doesn't duplicate input images but learns from them, which shouldn't infringe on copyright.
The next stage is to get Stability and Midjourney to completely wipe their datasets and start from sets that are only sourced from Artists who opt in.
If an art director prompts me as an illustrator with ideas, then curates my sketches or art, and suggests changes, nonetheless the work was done by me. I would have the copyright unless given away in a contract. AI cannot make a contract, and cannot hold a copyright.
Midjourney is a tool just like your camera. Only click can make you millions. I didn’t paint the it. Do I have to say I didn’t paint the photo ?
Ai tools are gonna get better and better. They person with the best skills and creative will always win.
So, can I use AI generated images in Midjourney for commercial use?
What about if someone will use my generations for commercial use?
Is it legat to use someone's AI-art for commercial? For example if someone has a paid monthly ai art magazine and uses ai-generated images by others?
Lawsuits are starting to rain down big time on scammers like you. Slots will never be art, it only builds useless and illiterate people unable to do anything for themselves.
There ain't such thing as AI artist. Typing doesn't make you an artist. Want to work describing things, be a writer.
Lol prompting is not a creative skill 😂😂😂😂
In my opinion, as a professional visual artist of about 20 years, I see AI art as a TOOL to be mastered not feared and fought against. Artists still know what makes good art. We just have more power than ever before. I understand the frustrations of copyright. My own artwork is out there to be used by AI. I'm 100% okay with this. Art should ideally be free for all anyways, and I say this as someone who literally is paid every two weeks from art that I create to feed myself. BREATHE people. Learn how to prompt craft. Focus on generating, improving and let go of your past work. Adapt, learn and improve with this new era. Humans will never stop craving art. Just because AI can create it doesn't mean we can't improve it, add context and adapt with it.
My advice to all "aspiring artists". Learn how to prompt craft. Iterate on the art AI generates. Make it better. Build upon what it creates. It's still yours and if you build on it enough, it'll be yours. Use your artistic skills to guide AI, think of creative ways to integrate AI artwork into new mediums and forms. Adapt or fail. That is your choice.
Once everyone can do what these prompters do, it devalues it.
it doesnt amaze me anymore. why protect your ai made things? why try to own it? when anyone can shit it out like you did.
cant wait until youtube is filled up with ai voice content videos drowning every human content uploader.
🤫 worse is yet to come
Danke!
So in other words you can do what you want with a.i. art. It's not copyrightable so I can put it under your own banner and do it as a self copyright. It basically means you cant be sued as long as you can more or less prove the a.i. did it.
People don't see the problem lies behind AI art. It may be a "tool" that can be used for good, but ultimately the data it's based on are STOLEN works without permission whatsoever. There is no waaay they are going to give money to the people they stole from for their AI database. There are billions of images out there being stolen, you can't possibly pay for that.
This is interesting, and clearly just the beginning. I think "human authorship" is too vague.
When a movie is produced, the copyright to that movie typically belongs to the movie's producer or production company. The producer is usually the individual or entity responsible for overseeing the creation of the film, managing the financial aspects, and making key decisions during its production.
It's the same for images. AI is just a tool of creative expression. Maybe more powerful than other traditional means, but still it's just an advanced tool.
AI generated movies will exist, but the copyright will belong to the production company/producer.
This discussion is far from over.
Ain't no way you're saying ai "artist"
Controlnet would override that if the user came up with the condition themselves.
If you are an artist.. why do you worry so much about the law? Oh right, because AI "artists" are thieves, you can't create
I could use your insight to help clear up my understanding on how to properly release an audio/visual project that I have just completed. I wrote, recorded and mastered 9 entirely original synth-wave songs. I used OpenAI to generate and edit 30 minutes of prompt-based visuals that I lined up to the beat of my original music. I'd like to release this as a single audio/visual, copyrighted piece of work on YouTube. Do you have advice on what I might need to consider in terms of copyrighting and monetizing this project? This is my first major release. Thank you Samson. -Carlos in Colorado
That means anyone can appropriate and sell the non-copyrightable images on tee shirts, cups, posters etc. In addition, the tech overlords can still take all your “iterations” to train AI and reuse the AI generated images the person “thinks” they have creatd
If it's in the internet, its under public domain. It is everyone's interest to protect their intellectual properties, it means do not published it that you're not willing to share it to the world, because you have specific consumers who are willing to give you money.
Because of China AI
This is a nice and instructive video.(AI and Virtual Reality: Creating Immersive Experiences with Technology) I hope there is a lot to learn from it.,,,,,,
The bits on "human authorship' are entirely arbitrary.
Hmm. Little late to the vid. But those first images from midjourney, when it started, were eye opening. It made me think even more creatively. To see how a machine puts images together was thought provolking.
What about custom datasets? For example, there are now tools for webcomics (or Graphic Novels) were the artist submits his own work (20-25 illustrations of a character he has drawn for example) to an AI to teach it his own artistic style and to give it a reference, and then gives it sketches so it can generate panels with that character in his own art style with his own character design, would he lose the copyrights to his own style, composition (submitted via the sketch) and character design because the final illustration was helped along by an AI?
It's not a gray area, you can use Ai as a tool, if the final results doesn't require use of other tools or a skill you have it's not your work, be honest what you actually contributed to the final outcome.
Dont tell me ai wannabes expected this rip of of zendaya to actually be copywritable.
Why have AI-generated movies and games not been in violation of copyrights? Why only AI-generated books?
6:54 Do not dwell in such heretical rethoric.
Stop defense soulless laziness AI work.
lets say i make a SD model with my own paintings, and then use image2image with sketches, photos, 3D renders, to make new paintings, is that copyrightable?
i struggle to understand the difference in definition between that not being human authorship, and other ways humans use machines to create art. i am really against currently copyrighted material being used for this tech but just dont understand why the tech in of itself is being demonized
The fundamental problem of generative artificial intelligences lies in the initial violation of the rights of the authors of the material used, in its "training" since in reality the images now encoded remain in its model, (this explains why companies offer the possibility of extracting them if you have the copyright) Therefore any image generated by the AI is always based on previously loaded images, if it does not have them it cannot generate them, therefore it does not learn copy. In short, the authorship of a user in the generation is minimal, only the idea, since with the same propmt the system generates very different images, like a lottery, and the ideas cannot be registered by themselves, they must belong to a work, and here the work is not human.
so its still ok to use is not just for a tool
do not normalize changing prompts 1000 times to get the correct output
Its absolutely not a tool and the nature of it replaces said artists.
AI is but a tool that depends on human input much like any other tool such as synthesizers for modern music which can be copyrighted.
All I see is how they are always stopping poor people from becoming rich