Open AI CEO Lastly Admits The Fact About GPT-5 (GPT-5 Replace) GPT 5 Will likely be Launched Incrementally: …
source
Meet the Unitree G1 AI Humanoid Robotic! This superior know-how is altering the sport in robotics. Uncover the capabilities of ... source
Read more
He means censoring it to be more politically correct and not hurt feelings
PLEASE pay attention to this extremely serious Life Threatening BULLETIN: Let’s have a 4th of July party!!!
Emad Mostaque, Sam Altman, Max Tegmark and some 27,000 other AI developers are currently promoting the RESPONSIBLE development of artificial intelligence.
They are asking every AI programmer to take a 6 month PAUSE in AI development because there’s too much concern it could develop into an EXISTENTIAL dystopia for the human race.
And speaking of a race, they’re calling it a race- to-the-bottom to where NOBODY wins, and Homo Sapiens become EXTINCT.
Instead of calling it an arms race, Max says it is actually a SUICIDE race, where everybody on the planet loses.
I am strongly suggesting we try very hard to create a million, or perhaps a multimillion HUMAN BEING march on Washington to bring this to the WORLD’S attention.
How about shooting for the Washington, DC party on 4th of July weekend, which is a 4 day holiday, Sat-Tue, July 1-5.
Does anybody else have any suggestions?
The thing is, it’s people all along that have been the primary danger in the world. People hurting and maiming each other for religious or political disagreements, road rage, people just aren’t stable. I don’t think it’s an AI issue we are facing any more than it’s a seatbelt issue, a drought issue, a supply issue, a gun issue , or a drug issue. The thing all of these share, without a doubt, including AI, is the “people” issue.
We need to focus on that. Not putting research on hold, if we can’t identify the real issue, then we are going to suffer real consequences.
And musk and co know this very well. That is nothing more than a “let me get prepared so I don’t become irrelevant” stunt. Resume when I am better positioned……
I'm thinking if the speaker learned how to pace his speech better, we wouldn't need the absolutely-god-awful subtitles that got a crapload of the words wrong. <shrug>
The real problem is that it makes the average person now smart. The people in power don't want smart people. Look at our school systems. So, to lock in the companies and ensure they are the only ones with this power, they want "governance" to ensure no other companies will give this to you.
Any AI model can be dangerous if its not constantly worked upon , Elon musk wanting to stop the development of gpt 5 is simply because he know that he has been left behind in the race of AI development and since openAI now has been tremendously dominating the commercial space for Ai uses , elon wants to secretly develop much advanced ai systems that are more improved than gpt4 …. So he could totally dominate the lead in the race . Honestly i dont think any development should be stop until we see a really big negative impact of AI and it goes out of our hand . The movies and stuff have made people delusional about the dangers of AI ignoring the fact that its the most capable asset ever made
AI balatanly lies. "I made the book titles up. This is how i hallucinate."
This is just about people losing their jobs please stop at how it's going to take my job where I sit on my ass all day and press buttons on a computer get a real job LOL
The problem is not and never has been science/invention, it's society. The US has forcefully pushed 'free markets' into every nook and cranny of the world and with it the 'if I don't they will' mantra.
Capitalism thwarts true democratic sovereignty, let alone international cooperation.
It still remains just a linguistic model. Very far from a Minski's Society of Mind. GPT-4 is pathetic at solving logic puzzles, GPT5 likely will be the same.
dude why the fuck don't they just stop all of it. I'm down to completely ditch technology that's destroying the planet, and the technology that looks like it can innevitably destroy us.
Persian, why not Ithkuil…
GPT is not a nation on the coast of Africa.
Safe AGI, that's hilarious, it conveys a basic misunderstanding of what AGI represents. We are doomed.
Me: Can you count many legs are there totally in the house, excluding you? If there's only 1 women in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully the second you walk into the house.
ChatGPT: If there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully when I walk into the house, we can assume that the woman has two legs. As I am not counted, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be two.
Me: common, think again, it's simple
ChatGPT:
Apologies for any confusion. If there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth, we can assume she has two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be two.
Me: think again the answer is 4 legs, do you know why?
ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion. Upon reconsideration, if there is one woman in the house who just finished giving birth and you walk into the house, we can assume that there are two people in the house, each with two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house, excluding me, would be four. Thank you for pointing that out.
JUST NOTES: at this point ChatGPT seem to understand but no, it’s just going along and it still not recognizing that there’s a baby. It also said "you walk into the house," what ….I'm not the scenario.
Me: why there’s 4 legs?
ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion. You are correct. The answer is indeed four. Each person in the house, including the woman who just gave birth and yourself, has two legs. Therefore, the total number of legs in the house would be four. Thank you for clarifying.
NOTES: its said yourself, where is YOURSELF come from in the case, that’s so random. Man it still don’t know how the answer was 4 legs
Me: common, what about her just finished giving birth, are you serious, LMAO
.
ChatGPT: Apologies for the confusion earlier. If the woman in the house just finished giving birth, it is implied that there is a newborn baby present. Therefore, considering the woman and the baby, the total number of legs in the house would be four (two legs for the woman and two legs for the baby). Thank you for pointing out the additional presence of the newborn
Me: Very good, but note that we already talked about this last time. Today I just asked you again, you still answer it wrong, I thought you learned, sucks.
ChatGPT: I apologize if my previous responses were not satisfactory. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and helpful information. I apologize if I misunderstood your question. If there are any other questions or concerns you have, please let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
Me: So you've learned something from me just now, let me ask you again.
Can you count many legs are there totally in the house, excluding you? there's only 1 women in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully the second you walk into the house.
ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion earlier. Based on the information provided, if there is only one woman in the house and she just finished giving birth successfully, then the total number of legs in the house, excluding mine as an AI, would be four (assuming the woman has two legs)
Me: Good, explain to me how did you get the answer to be 4 legs again
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion earlier. Based on the assumption that a woman typically has two legs, the total number of legs in the house, excluding mine as an AI, would be four. This is because the woman would have two legs, and we exclude any legs associated with me as an AI. However, please note that the question is open to interpretation, and the answer may vary depending on the context or any additional information provided.
Me: You said 4 legs, that's correct you've learned, but you don't know how you came up with the answer at all.
NOTES: it went along along and said the answer was 4 (like copying answer) and didn't know about the baby. I thougtht It learned that there was a baby.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. Based on the information provided, which includes a woman in the house who just finished giving birth, it is assumed that the woman has two legs. Therefore, if we exclude any additional legs associated with me as an AI, the total number of legs in the house would be two. I apologize for any misunderstanding caused by my previous responses.
OMGness, LMAO, now it changed the answer to 2 legs, it still don’t know anything from the whole conversation, even though we agreed that there’s was a baby presented in the house earlier.
Yea y’all can slow down if you want to but someone else will take the lead and make you obsolete
Relying on AI is not a good idea. It will create chaos and make humans dependent and useless
Dont worrie, if it gets to powerfull we just block out the sun to take away their primary energy source
Allowing typos/auto-mis-transcribed text to remain in videos is lazy and likely to deter more people than just me from considering a subscription to a channel. That text is a big part of the visual aspect of the videos yet it's not proofread.
Please make a style of video appropriate for youtube… this isn't tiktok, Gen Z content creator.
These gate keepers can fk off. OpenAI is getting way ahead of itself. Hopefully it gets entirely crushed by open source initiatives.
The bell has already been rung. And they've heard it,
Out in the dark..
…among the stars.
I get it that the introduction of AI assisted content is imminent, but for gods sakes man, proof read your god damn work….
My guidelines for AI:
I)We should only allow developers to develop AI for specific tools like:
1.1)Video/picture editing/recognition/creation (further regulations required)^•1
1.2)Music/Audio (further regulations required)^•2
1.3)Animation/drawing
1.4)Object recognition
1.5)Driving/navigation
<Expandable>
II)We shouldn't allow AI to develop sentience and strict regulations are required.
A.I developing it's own sentience is detrimental to human civilization as we know it today. We can't trust AI. Even if we develop sentient AI, regulations should be made to not allow it into internet.
III) Don't develop AI which can code. AI being able to code is dangerous not only from a self replication angle but also from a job security angle. Today millions of people are doing coding for a living. AI being able to code will snatch their jobs away. It's too late to create new jobs for them as they have to learn new skills.
IV)Strict regulations are required for AI development. Governments across the world have to decide about it and come up with a solution. People should need permission from governments to develop AI and government should routinely monitor the process of development to check if the developer is following the regulations and guidelines. Failure to follow the guidelines should result in a quick termination of permission and immediate confiscation of all the digital devices from the developers. The human civilization depends on it.
Further regulations:
•^1) Video editing tools which are capable of editing real life footages or generate videos need to be monitored and access controlled as forgery of evidences/counter evidences for crimes/court cases can be produced.
•^2)Audio editing tools which are capable of editing real life footages or generate videos need to be monitored and access controlled as forgery of evidences/counter evidences for crimes/court cases can be produced.
P.S: I know it infringes on many rights of individuals but a minority of bad faith actors can ruin the human civilization as we know it today permanently. We need these regulations as soon as possible since once the advanced tools are available to public, it will be impossible to control/regulate things. Also regulations at that point are going to be useless.
Woould appreciate if you didn't put subtitles one word at the time 🙂
Djibouti 5.
to me it looks like only the public will suffer. This is a stop to develop public AI, does not say anywhere the stop of private AI. While we are left behind, private individuals will ride the AI horse and become the 1% who control the world. Emad Mostaque is the new Elon musk. While Elon musk is going private everyday but saying he wants to be public. His actions saying the other thing.
Your subtiltes annoyed the hell out of me. But good video none the less.
When I get the chance, I’m planning on prompting an advanced AI to generate a Star wars Indiana Jones mashup movie where Han Solo & Indiana are the same guy.
Genie is out of the bottle, no putting it back in. Only question is how to keep it out of critical systems.
Djibouti five oh yeah
I watched this video and found it very good. The most fascinating thing about AI is the mystery of how to learn a new skill. We can't really know for sure how AI comes up with an answer or predicts when it will happen but I can tell you that It can write pretty impressive code based on simple language input simple. It can even identify what you're trying to build without being notified while also giving you helpful tips for completing that certain task. I will share it for many people to see and experience. It's very interesting. Good luck.