Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, the corporate behind GPT-4, ChatGPT, DALL-E, Codex, and plenty of different state-of-the-art AI …
source
Tags: agiaiai podcastAltmanartificial intelligenceartificial intelligence newsartificial intelligence news 2023artificial intelligence podcastCEOChatGPTFridmanfutureGPT4latest news about robotics technologylatest robotslatest robots 2023Lexlex ailex fridmanlex jrelex mitlex podcastmachine learningmit aiOpenAIPodcastrobot newsrobotics newsrobotics news 2023robotics technologies llcrobotics technologySamSam Altman
Here are the timestamps. Please check out our sponsors to support this podcast.
0:00 – Introduction & sponsor mentions:
– NetSuite: http://netsuite.com/lex to get free product tour
– SimpliSafe: https://simplisafe.com/lex
– ExpressVPN: https://expressvpn.com/lexpod to get 3 months free
4:36 – GPT-4
16:02 – Political bias
23:03 – AI safety
43:43 – Neural network size
47:36 – AGI
1:09:05 – Fear
1:11:14 – Competition
1:13:33 – From non-profit to capped-profit
1:16:54 – Power
1:22:06 – Elon Musk
1:30:32 – Political pressure
1:48:46 – Truth and misinformation
2:01:09 – Microsoft
2:05:09 – SVB bank collapse
2:10:00 – Anthropomorphism
2:14:03 – Future applications
2:17:54 – Advice for young people
2:20:33 – Meaning of life
AI + Quantum Computer + Dojo + Humanoid Robot = ??
I wonder what those critics say now. 😀
How they collected data from google !google does not allow access all websites at once?😢🎉
This Sam is sooo fake!
God doesn't think that he is Sam Altmen. To bad that all this crap doesn't think of how many people will be missed informed, job less , homeless, degrading.. and all for sam team to be reach and narcissistic narcissistic. You are not authentic Sam Altmen. I don't like you.
The average IQ of a person is 100, Einstein's was 160, it estimated that within the next year, the most advanced AI's IQ will be 1600. I only hope that AI will need humans for some menial task.😮
asked about communism, but i wonder if anyone has considered the resource based econmomy of the venus project, where there is no more national governemt but instead superintelligent AGI along side a panel of humans making and basing decisions siouly on scientific evidence. Letting AI run the monitoring distrribution and production of our resources bring that which is less from places that have more to places with less aslmost as a worldwide communism when it comes to food and energy resoucres.
By putting it out there for the world to test and give input; Design by committee, i.e. world committee, ultimate best results, though timely.
How will this enhance our lives? Isn’t the beauty of life in the wonder of discovery and accomplishment individually?
How did you ask that question, “Do I look fat in this dress?” With a straight face?
“We are much more interested in what humans do” – yes, yes, yes.
We are wise enough to know the power we possess with that in mind we honorably grow and advance our civilization to heaven on earth it is only possible if we maintain a vision & desire for wholeness.. I'm so blessed to be here in this generation projecting these possibilities.
Altman's speech and attitude as if he had introduced "a new electric scooter technology" surprised me. Now I'm really scared. This guy can do anything for success, reputation and the title (the man who changed the world forever) without worrying about safety.
Lex is amazing and his feelings reflect many of us both excited and terrified. His hardwood and empathy are incredible!
weird that in a podcast about AI @tunerr7712 and @mtstudio6271 have basically the same comment expressed in a slightly different way and both are purportedly 83 years old. hmm
Mort
What a serious guy, never smiled or told a joke. Even Lex put on a smile a couple of times…
In the Trump vs Biden Jordan Peterson question ….I wonder if the fact the internet has more data or just in general there is more data biased towards "praising" Biden and "destroying" Trump affected the outcome ….. in general if a human was to search info about both, I think the biased info online would make you think Trump is a terrible person, while Biden a "good" person …. so the data sources and the amount of biased data can skew the outcomes …….. this leads to the question Lex asked "do I look fat in this dress" , sure in the context of being human, we can lie and say no , however do we want this models to think lying on occasions is ok. Or do we want them to be accurate and truthful , based on factual information ? …I would think they need to be accurate and truthful , as lying even if they are "white" lies , they are wrong …
This comment is for Sam Altman. In response to what would you ask a super intelligence: I mean you no disrespect but do you really think that you (or any other human) would even be able to comprehend an answer to a question that requires knowledge that we don’t yet know, let alone understand? What you are suggesting is an actual end point to knowledge. That is not a utopia. That is a wasteland. What makes life meaningful is a feeling of achievement, a sense of progress over our struggles and shared understanding that we all go through struggles and thus helps build a collective compassion about the human condition (what it actually means to be human) and this includes acceptance of endings (as heart-breaking as they are) and the little kindnesses that mean so much but require so little, like a smile from a stranger. Without minimising that real suffering exists, you can change your life by changing your attitude. You don’t need technology for that. In response to AI, people often choose to evoke Dr Frankenstein. I think it’s because Mary Shelley was almost pre-eminent in her wisdom: Dr Frankenstein alone creates the creature, he sees what it is, lying there inanimate and yet he continues because it’s all about progress. It is only when he sees it awake that he runs away, horrified. We know the rest.
Is this person a teenager? He sounds like one.
Pareto Rule re collective good.
Epic
I don't want to hurt Sam with this comment, but the fact that he has transformed his nose does not generate the level of confidence that someone who has the ability to modify human condition, create a disease, or cause mass destruction should inspire. I consider that altering one's face is a sufficiently violent and irrational trait that someone with such responsibility should not possess. This type of behavior suggests to me that they may lack the mental strength, objectivity, and neutrality required to understand nature in its purest form, without wanting to alter its most fundamental aspects due to perceived flaws, whether they are aesthetic, behavioral, etc., that should be corrected with force, just like removing parts of their nose cartilage, with absolute certainty
I think this is the interview of the century in that it informs us clearly what the game plan is and the time line of AI progress however, it is delusional to think that anyone can control this no matter what your safeguards are and realistically it is common sense greed and domination of the world will drive this to its frightening conclusion , it is amazing we to me personally we haven’t destroyed ourselves already given all the rhetoric regarding the possibilities for good that discussed because of mentality of what is desirable to humanity who have no choice. Line up for what happened at the Enlightenment, drenched in blood!