Let’s discuss AI Artwork, Lensa, ChatGPT, and why it is all deeper than you assume. Lower your expenses with Karma at …
source
Tags: aiai artartificial intelligenceartificial intelligence newsartificial intelligence news 2023chat gotChatGPTcreativeDall-eDALLE 2latest news about robotics technologylatest robotslatest robots 2023Lensa AImachine learningmkbhdrobot newsrobotics newsrobotics news 2023robotics technologies llcrobotics technologystolen artTruth
well it means that all the drudgery has been taken out of making art so we can have plenty of spare time to go work in a car factory.
Give it time a few more years youre obsolet
Would it be possible to make realistic AI pics of Chrome balls? Like if the balls were in a Lab or professorially taken. What are your thoughts?
To think that we might end up living in a world where we have to do dull laborious jobs while we consume media created by a few extremely wealthy people using AI is incredibly depressing.
Maaaan, that VSauce-like twist in the intro, even with the music
vsuce
Just an error on your part MKBHD, Coz ChatGPT model is only trained until august I think where the question you asked about iPhone 14 Pro is in September 2022
So maybe I think its was just assuming the answers
That Vsauce transition was fire
Yes, even I as AI art generator, it is very sickening when AI was sometimes, so dumb generate the Art😩 I need to be super creative to make the Art look so well and rational in some parts 😂😂
When it comes to AI art, that's just an oxymoron. If you use other person's work for profit without their consent, that's textbook IP theft, it's as simple as that.
It's infuriating to me that we keep making the same mistake over and over again – letting the new invention into worldwide circulation before creating any kind of functional regulatory framework around it 🤦♀️
I think AI just shows us that what we think creativity and imagination was is totally overrated.
the engineers just download art and train the AI. It's not AI stealing, it's the engineers.
This video is underrated, it's got way too less views. Simply amazing.
es bonito ver a bellezas, pero de pronto aparece el pato feo, eso destruye el video.
THE REAL MILES MORALES
To anyone that thinks AI is "thinking", ask yourself, does a calculator "think" when you input 1+1 and come up with 2 as an answer? The calculator doesn't "know" anything. It's just executing an algorithm.This is highly reductive, but it illustrates that there is no thought involved in any of this. We're just looking at more complex calculations with AI, There's no self-awareness, no consciousness, no humanity. Just statistical analysis. And even if it gets to the point where the difference between what AI generates and what a human would generate, it's still just a parlor trick. A very useful parlor trick, but not a new life form.
Dude, the bottom line is AI needs a person to enter something in the prompt.
Not from scratch it's a predictive model.
That Vsauce jazz doe 🎶
Love this discussion. Yes, I need to sleep. Work is throwing my schedule all the way off 😂 but yes, AI is a collaborator, not a usurper. There is so much good coming ! — Lauren Brown
Eh, remember when people said the only jobs save from robots are creative?
the way models can generalize and how you can decode them is.
re errors: Dalle 2 isnt stable Diffusion.
LAION5B isnt common crawl. It says "images have their respective copyright". OpenAI and Adobe bought all licenses for their training set.
Dream booth (like the lensa stuff) is just fine tuned ontop of stable diffusion which uses a LAION subset oike 400m english only high aesthetic.
The anime style AI art has gotten really good.
A few points to consider.
1. If AI draws from a database, it requires the database to exist and can't go beyond that. For example, it can't form a new insight that goes beyond an existing essay published online.
2. If AI becomes the majority of online content, there is no longer any value. If YouTube just becomes a bunch of ChatGPT scripts, and AI generated videos, what's the interest?
3. Even when machines became capable of making things that only human hands could make, hand-made items still possessed a value and are now sold specially because they are hand-made.
Incredible video bro! Love the content
I haven't really seen much original artwork before this so who cares? lol
My 2 cents as an "Artist". A.I is a tool. It won't make you into an artist anymore than a plane will turn you into a bird. You need to be a true artist in all sense of the word for A.I to work for you: creativity, originality, some talent, and a metric ton of practice. Relax.
My problem is when companies dont see the value in human creation , and they want cheap things as we express them as souless, and they replace people in a world where we need money to survive and grow as well, meanwhile the companies achieve more money and less work ., being in a third world country, here in mexico where the minimun wage is the equivilant of 17 usd dollars a day, being freelance artist and have people want to just commission sketches to use on a dataset to fill them in with color meanwhile i get payed less , is already scaring me a lot
then why are scrip writers going on strike because thay are getting replaced ?
Honestly I like AI art
The question "Will AI replace you." The Answer "Eventually Yes*" *Not you exactly, but the progress that AI is making will eventually lead to a point where it will be good enough, cheap enough, that people won't care enough to go out of their way for something crafted by a person… Unless they're well off and desire such things. After all in an age where people have cameras attached to their phone, they still hire photographers. People still commission works of art by artists even though there are cheaper alternatives. But for the masses of creatives out there, it will be no different than the last industrial revolution.
"Speedrunning Inspiration" was an interesting take, very cool. And a little scary of course
What's the Ai app or program you use to make those fun portraits you post on twitter (X).
Buenooo
Hey Bro
Reaching out to You, I'm a Twitter and Facebook Global fan from South Africa.
Can you gift me a Android flagship phone?
Thanks Bro
Has anyone else watched the terminator movies? Turn them off.
i think there must be another app to validate what AI generated in some specific subject.
The fact that I went “I am getting all the information I need in the first couple minutes” and then realized “wait, this is an MKBHD video, they aren’t this short”
"not to take my job" – but to take others. got it…….
How on earth is AI generation violating copyright? The whole point of art and creative work is to express yourself freely as you want no matter what style the type of art has.
Just because your art has a very similar or basically even identical inspired style to someone else's art it is not at all wrong.
Even with music it's the same: Imagine you just naturally have almost the same voice as Drake or you're an impersonator and create music where your voice sounds exactly like Drake this should never be copyrighted because it's created by you from scratch and is unique, it's not as if you leak confidential audio recordings of the real Drake and publish them without his consent because in the other case it's your own unique content and you don't even have to use the same name of a popular person or existing trade marked company name and can just call the artist name Dake instead of Drake for example.
Just because an AI isn't human it doesn't make it different. AI is literally based on the same nature or brains work with neural networks and is doing the exact same thing like a human: copying work from others "in their brains" and recreating it.
No one owns a voice tone or type of art style, that's the whole point of art in my opinion to freely express yourself and everything against this is oppressing that.
That are just greedy people in my opinion who don't care about that and just want to suck out money out of everything.
If you're inspired by Picasso's art style and draw exactly like him or have the exact same voice like Drake that's perfectly fine and doesn't mean you're not allowed to make music just because your voice sounds like Drake, no matter if you're a human, dog or AI.
This whole legal debacle should've long been easily eliminated because of this basic common sense in my opinion.
he is being watched by the mac
Creativity is one of the last things AI will conquer.
It will sooner replace technical skills like programming or drawing accurate shapes or making automated translation that sounds human.
But creativity stems from human experience. And that would be the last thing to go.
I dabble in AI art. People who say it isn't art are stupid. The amount of artistic choices, tweaks and references I need to make to get a good picture is significant. The difference between slop that you can generate in 5 minutes just from a prompt and a refined image is night and day.
AI is at the moment just a tool like Photoshop. People used to hate digital art and call it "not a real art" in 1990s and early 2000s. It changed. The attitude to AI art will change as well.
The reason people hate it is because generating slop became easy. 3 years ago artists charged $50 for a generic character drawing on an empty background with simple shading. Now they can't, and that makes them upset. But what you need to recognize is that is a very low-quality work that was overpriced AF.
At the same time take best digital artists – and AI is not Even close. I am not sure if you can create a piece of artwork that is comparable with a commercial artist from a big studio. It is 80/20 rule. We got 80% of the way now and a lot of people who just want a drawing of their character are very happy with it. But if you want a production quality concept art – You will have to hire an artist. And that will be true for the next decade or two at least, at which point robots and AI will replace 60% of our jobs anyway and there will be ways to survive without a job.
"Artists don't consent for their art to be used"
Yeah, no. We don't have rules about learning from other people's art. You can't sell another person's drawings as yours, but you can learn to imitate their style and color palette and shapes. You are allowed to draw a picture of a Batman and the only way you can do this is by learning from existing Batman drawings.
This is what AI does. It doesn't copy. It doesn't steal. It learns.
And that is allowed.